To comprehend the disparities between Vue 2 and Vue 3, it's essential to trace the framework's evolution. Vue.js embarked on its journey as a modest runtime library, gradually transitioning into a full-fledged framework over time. Today, Vue.js has earned recognition as an accessible, high-performing, and adaptable framework, pivotal in the development of dynamic web user interfaces.
Vue.js 2 is a prevalent JavaScript framework utilized extensively in crafting user interfaces. Recognized for its simplicity and adaptability, it empowers web developers to construct interactive web applications with ease. Vue.js 2 operates on a reactive and component-based architecture, facilitating the segmentation of the application's UI into reusable components for enhanced modularity and scalability.
Vue.js 3 stands as the latest iteration of the Vue.js JavaScript framework, meticulously crafted for the development of modern and high-performing web applications. Distinguished by a host of significant improvements and optimizations over its predecessor, Vue 2, Vue 3 places emphasis on bolstered performance, reduced bundle sizes, and enhanced TypeScript integration. Central to Vue 3 is the Composition API, offering developers a more adaptable and modular approach to organizing code within components, fostering greater code reusability and maintainability.
Moreover, Vue.js 3 enhances the virtual DOM algorithm to streamline rendering and updates, resulting in expedited application performance and smoother user experiences. Despite the advancements of Vue 3, Vue 2 continues to be utilized by numerous companies worldwide, attributed to its distinct advantages and the relatively recent emergence of Vue 3, with Vue 2 slated to remain supported until the end of 2023.
The initial disparity between Vue 2 and Vue 3 arises during the process of creating an application from scratch. To kickstart the standard application setup, including the installation of Vue CLI (Command Line Interface), developers must follow specific procedures.
In Vue 2, adhering to a single root element within a template is imperative; any attempt to include multiple roots results in an error being thrown. However, Vue 3 diverges from this restriction, enabling the inclusion of multiple root elements within the same template without encountering errors. This newfound flexibility in Vue 3's templating system provides developers with greater freedom in structuring their components.
In a Vue 2 application, attempting to include multiple root elements within a template will halt the process, triggering an error message. Conversely, in Vue 3, such constraints are lifted, allowing the inclusion of multiple root elements without triggering error messages.
Here's an example showcasing the difference:
This distinction affords developers greater flexibility in Vue 3, as demonstrated by the inclusion of multiple web components within the same file without encountering any error messages.
And if we run the application, the outcome is
Below are the Form Component implementations in Vue 2 and Vue 3:
Vue 2 Application Form Component:
Vue 3 Application Form Component:
These implementations showcase the Form Component templates for both Vue 2 and Vue 3 applications, illustrating the differences in syntax and data handling between the two versions.
In Vue 2 and Vue 3, managing data differs due to the Options API in Vue 2 and the Composition API in Vue 3. The Options API organizes code into distinct properties like data, computed properties, and methods, while the Composition API groups code by function.
For a simple form component with properties for employee username and password, let's compare the data setup in Vue 2 and Vue 3.
Vue 2 Code with Options API:
Vue 3 Code with Composition API:
In Vue 3's Composition API, developers leverage the setup() method to handle component initialization. By using reactive() from Vue, data becomes reactive. This approach offers developers finer control over reactivity, improving performance and code organization.
Creating methods in Vue 2 and Vue 3 applications involves different approaches, with Vue 2 relying on the Options API and Vue 3 utilizing the Composition API.
In Vue 2, methods are declared within the methods property of the component object.
In Vue 3, the Composition API is used to handle methods. Within the setup() method, methods are declared as regular JavaScript functions, which are then returned for accessibility within other parts of the component. This approach offers more flexibility and control over method declaration compared to Vue 2's Options API.
In Vue 2, developers can directly access lifecycle hooks from the component options. For instance:
In Vue 3, with the Composition API, the setup() method includes lifecycle hooks. However, these hooks are not automatically available and need to be imported. For example, to use the mounted lifecycle hook, developers need to import the onMounted() method.
Here's how it's done:
In this example, the onMounted() method is imported, and inside the setup() method, it's utilized to define the behavior when the component is mounted. This approach offers more flexibility and control over lifecycle hooks in Vue 3 compared to Vue 2.
In Vue 2, computed properties are defined in a separate section, distinct from data properties. Here's an example:
To use computed properties in Vue 3, developers need to import computed into the component. The structure is similar to an arrow function, but it must be wrapped in a computed key within the setup() method:
In this Vue 3 example, computed() from Vue is imported, and the computed property is defined within the setup() method. Finally, it's returned for use in the template. This demonstrates the process of using computed properties in Vue 3, which offers more flexibility and control compared to Vue 2.
Accessing props differs significantly between Vue 2 and Vue 3, particularly in how props are referenced within components.
In Vue 2, referencing props typically involves using `this` within the component's methods or lifecycle hooks. For instance:
In Vue 3, however, accessing props is handled differently. The setup() method is used, which takes two arguments: props for immutable access to the component's props and context for selected properties exposed by Vue 3 (such as emit, slots, and attrs). Here's how it looks:
For non-<script setup> components:
In Vue 3's single file components (SFCs) using <script setup>, props can be declared using the defineProps() macro:
These approaches demonstrate the difference in accessing props between Vue 2 and Vue 3, showcasing how Vue 3 offers more flexibility and clarity in managing props within components.
In Vue 2, emitting events involves using this.$emit within the component's methods to trigger an event that can be caught by a parent component. Here's an example of how it's done:
In Vue 3, accessing this directly is no longer the norm, so emitting events is handled differently. The setup() method provides access to the emit function via the context argument. Here's how it looks:
Additionally, in Vue 3, a component can explicitly declare the events it will emit using the defineEmits() macro within the <script setup> section:
In this example, defineEmits() declares the events the component will emit, and then the emit function can be used to trigger those events. This approach ensures clarity and consistency in event handling within Vue 3 components.
Portals in Vue 3 offer a convenient way to render components from one part of the DOM tree into another component in a different part of the DOM tree. While Vue 2 required the use of a third-party plugin like portal-vue to achieve similar functionality, Vue 3 introduced an in-built <Teleport> feature, making portal usage simpler and more accessible.
With Vue 3's <Teleport> tag, any code enclosed within it can be seamlessly teleported to a specified target location. The<Teleport> tag accepts a to attribute specifying the target destination.
Here's a basic example to illustrate the concept of portals:
In this example, any content enclosed within the <Teleport> tag, such as the "Hey, Everyone!!!" message, will be displayed at the target location specified by the to attribute.
At the time of writing, please note that <Teleport> functionality may not be available in certain versions of Vue 3, such as the Alpha version mentioned above. However, once implemented, <Teleport> offers a streamlined approach to managing portal functionality within Vue 3 components.
In Vue 2, developers can define filters to apply common text formatting directly within the template. Here's an example:
In Vue 3, achieving the same functionality involves using computed properties. Here's how it's done:
In this Vue 3 example, a reactive accountBalance variable is defined using ref(), and then a computed property accountInUSD is created to format the balance in USD. While filters are not available in Vue 3, computed properties provide a flexible alternative for achieving similar functionality.
In Vue 2, developers can utilize the watch property to observe and react to data changes. Here's an example:
In Vue 3, developers have the option to use the watchEffect() function for reactive observing changes in data. watchEffect() reruns whenever its dependencies change. This provides flexibility and efficiency in handling reactive updates.
Here's how it's done:
Alternatively, developers can also use the watch function, which is familiar to Vue 2 users:
Both approaches offer reactive data observing capabilities, providing developers with options based on their preferences and familiarity with Vue 2 or Vue 3 syntax.
In Vue 2, event buses are commonly used for communication between components. Here's how you can implement event buses in Vue 2:
Firstly, you can create a global event bus instance using Vue's prototype:
With the event bus set up, you can emit and listen for events in your components:
In Vue 3, you can use the Mitt library for handling events between components. Here's how you can set up Mitt in a Vue 3 project:
First, install the Mitt library:
Then, in the main.js file, provide Mitt globally:
Now, you can use Mitt in your Vue 3 components by injecting it:
This setup allows you to achieve similar functionality to event buses in Vue 2, with the added benefits of being compatible with Vue 3's composition API and providing a lightweight solution for event handling.
In Vue.js 2, setting up the router involves creating a router instance separately and passing it to the Vue application using Vue.use(Router) before creating the root Vue instance. Here's an example:
Usage in Vue 2 components involves accessing the router instance through $router:
In Vue.js 3, router setup is more aligned with the Composition API style. You can create the router instance directly inside your application setup. Here's an example:
Usage in Vue 3 components involves using useRouter and useRoute from vue-router:
With Vue 3, router setup becomes more streamlined and aligns better with the Composition API paradigm.
In Vue.js 2, Vuex is the most commonly used state management library. It provides a centralized store for all the components in an application. Here's how you typically set up and use Vuex in a Vue 2 application:
In Vue.js 3, Vuex 4 is compatible for state management, but you also have the option of using Pinia, a new state management alternative designed specifically for Vue3.
Here's how you can set up and use Vuex 4 or Pinia in a Vue 3 application:
In Vue 3, you have the flexibility to choose between Vuex 4 and Pinia for state management, depending on your project requirements and preferences. Both libraries offer powerful state management solutions tailored for Vue 3 applications.
Higher community adoption of Vue 3 may lead to better support, resources, and a larger talent pool of Vue 3 developers over time.
In conclusion, Vuex has long been a reliable state management solution for Vue.js applications, offering a centralized store, predictable state mutations, and seamless integration with Vue.js 2. However, with the introduction of Vue.js 3, Pinia emerges as a modern alternative to Vuex. Pinia provides similar features as Vuex but leverages Vue.js 3's Composition API for more intuitive state management.
Additionally, Pinia offers improved TypeScript support, better reactivity, and simplified syntax, making it an excellent choice for state management in Vue.js 3 applications. While Vuex remains a dependable option, Pinia's modern approach and flexibility position it as a compelling choice for state management in Vue.js 3 projects. Ultimately, the choice between Vuex and Pinia depends on project requirements, preferences, and compatibility with Vue.js versions.
Hire our dedicated developers to leverage Vue.js expertise for your next project and drive innovation.
Portfolio
Recent
Projects
Explore Projects